Legal Opinion

Murray v. Wiley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1942PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

It is undisputed that in August, 1932, the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant attorneys in a substantial sum, on account of work performed by them in connection with litigation in which plaintiff was then interested.

In August, 1932, the plaintiffs, Murray and wife, were the owners of the Murray building, subject to the Pacific Savings and Loan Association mortgage, and of the Keystone Apartments on 8th street, in the city of Klamath Falls, which was also subject to a first mortgage. On or about August 1st, the plaintiff, Murray, and the defendant attorneys entered into discussions…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. Portland Flour Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Weber v. RothchildOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Thompson v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Belt Et Ux. v. MatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Shea v. LeonisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Elvalsons v. Industrial Covers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Nelson v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Schlecht v. Equitable Builders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Portland Trust & Savings Bank v. Lincoln Realty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Schroeder Et Ux. v. ToedtmeierOregon Supreme Court · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API