Legal Opinion

Umpqua Forest Industries v. Neenah-Oregon Land Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1950PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

This is a suit wherein the plaintiff Umpqua Forest Industries, a corporation, seeks to have a deed declared to be a mortgage. Plaintiff alleges that it is the owner of two tracts of timber land which are described in the complaint, the first of which we shall call the Kruse tract, and the second, the County tract. The complaint states that on or about 24 February 1942 the defendant Roseburg Plywood Corporation, as the then owner, executed and delivered to the defendant Schaefer a warranty deed to said lands, the consideration stated therein being $6,714; that on 28 February 1942 the defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harper v. Interstate Brewery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Corey v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  3. O'Briant v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Harmon v. Grants Pass Banking & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Caro v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Security Bank v. ChiapuzioOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Blue River Sawmills, Ltd. v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Marston v. MYERS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rizo v. MacBethAlaska Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API