Legal Opinion
DeVries v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 22, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 07-0399, 1 CA-CV 07-0424PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge.
¶ 1 “In any proceeding in which a state statute, ordinance, franchise or rule is alleged to be unconstitutional,” Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-1841 (A) (Supp.2007) requires a party to serve the Attorney General, and, pursuant to a 2006 amendment, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate, with “a copy of the pleading, motion or document containing the allegation at the same time the other parties in the action are served.” The issues we address in this opinion are, first, whether the 2006 amendment requiring service on…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Madison v. GrosethCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- DeVries v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Green v. GarriottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000076Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Diane Merrill v. Robert Kenneth MerrillArizona Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.