Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided April 9, 1991No. 72745PublishedCited by 171 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES SHANGLER, Special Judge.
The plaintiffs Linda Mahoney and Richard Mahoney, husband and wife, brought an action for medical malpractice against defendants Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc., a professional corporation, and Allen Doerhoff, M.D., and Carl Doerhoff, M.D., Missouri Osteopathic Foundation, doing business as Still Osteopathic Hospital, and St. Mary’s Hospital. The suit was brought on September 22, 1989. After the lapse of 90 days, the several defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs action for failure to comply with § 538.225, RSMo 1986. That section provides that no later…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- Chromalloy American Corp. v. Elyria Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Doe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, (Consolidated with)Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Adams v. Children's Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.