Legal Opinion
Madison v. Groseth
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 5, 2012No. 1 CA-CV 11-0222PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal requires us to address the applicability of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 33-811(0 (West 2012),1 which mandates waiver of all defenses to a trustee’s sale if the objecting party fails to obtain an injunction before the sale date, when a trustor asserts the trustee failed to provide proper notice of the sale. After interpreting § 33-811(C), we decide Sherryl Madison waived all defenses and objections to the trustee’s sale of her property. Because the validity of that sale underlies the tort claims she asserts against the successful bidders at…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Thomas D. Powell, in Re Brian BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Moy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Snyder v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Sitton v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Morgan AZ Financial, L.L.C. v. GotsesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Bank of Ny v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.