Legal Opinion
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 2005No. CV-04-0033-PRPublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Justice.
¶ 1 This case requires us to determine the effect of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 9-462.02(C) (Supp.2004) on numerous zoning enforcement actions filed by the City of Tucson (“the City”) against Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. (“Clear Channel”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article 6, Section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution, and A.R.S. § 12-120.24 (2003).
I
¶ 2 This case comes to us as a result of almost twenty years of legal skirmishing between the City and owners of advertising billboards. In 1985, the City adopted an ordinance regulating the size, location,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Kent K. v. Bobby M.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Robert J Nicaise Jr v. Aparna SundaramArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- David Stambaugh v. Mark KillianArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- McCloud v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.