Ingram v. Hook's Drugs, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs Ronald and Adele Ingram filed suit against Hooks Drugs, alleging that Hook’s failure to warn either plaintiff of possible side effects associated with the medication Valium was the proximate cause of injuries suffered by Ronald Ingram. Hook’s Drugs filed a Motion to Dismiss which by virtue of Ind.Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 12(b)(8), was transformed into a Motion for Summary Judgment. After a hearing, the trial court granted the motion, stating:
“... the Court now finds that the defendant’s pharmacist, and the defendant, had no legal duty in the filling of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Neal, Admr. v. Home Builders, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- McKee v. American Home Products Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Dooley v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Hooks SuperX, Inc. v. McLaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Roger N. Phelps v. Sherwood Medical Industries and Argyle AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.