Legal Opinion

Hooks SuperX, Inc. v. McLaughlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1994No. 50S03-9411-CV-1067PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Where 'a pharmacy customer is having a prescription for a dangerous drug refilled at an unreasonably faster rate than the rate prescribed, the pharmacist has a duty to cease refilling the prescription pending direct and explicit directions from the prescribing physician.

Pharmacy customers, Patrick and Michelle McLaughlin (plaintiffs-appellees below), seek transfer after the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, which had recognized such a duty, and ordered the entry of summary judgment in favor of Hooks-SuperX, Inc., Kathy O'Dell and Craig Merrick…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Miller v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Stephenson v. LedbetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Havert v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rhodes v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. April Goodwin, Tiffany Randolph and Javon Washington v. Yeakle's Sports Bar and Grill, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Paragon Family Restaurant v. BartoliniIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Delta Tau Delta, Beta Alpha Chapter v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API