Legal Opinion

McKee v. American Home Products Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1989No. 53941-3PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.

The plaintiff, Elaine McKee, appeals a summary judgment dismissing her cause of action against defendant pharmacists Gerald Sidran and Leonard Mezistrano. The trial court ruled that the pharmacists, who had filled McKee's drug prescriptions for 10 years, had no duty to warn her of the adverse side effects of long-term administration of that drug. We affirm.

From 1974 through 1984 McKee received prescriptions for Plegine, an appetite suppressant, from her family physician to control an ostensible weight problem. Plegine is an amphetamine and is potentially addictive. It is a class III drug,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cottam v. CVS PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API