Legal Opinion

Finley-Gordon Carpet Co. v. Bay Shore Homes, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1966No. Civ. 8121PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

Defendant, Bay Shores Homes, appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff partnership, Finley-Gordon Carpet Co., $18,864 plus interest and costs for carpeting installed under contract.

Plaintiff installed carpeting in defendant’s apartments by the “taekless strip method.” The apartments, 10 two-story units of four apartments each, were designed so carpets could be interchanged between rooms in an apartment and between apartments. The tackless strip method involves cutting carpet to room size; nailing strips of wood containing little barbs or tacks sticking up toward the wall at a 60 degree angle…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. E. A. Davis & Co. v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Shelley v. KofkaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marston's Inc. v. Roman Catholic Church of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Walker v. ThornsberryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Harbor Millwork, Inc. v. AchttienCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. People v. Custom Craft Carpets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Vivian v. Heritage Shutters, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API