Legal Opinion

E. A. Davis & Co. v. Richards

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1953No. Civ. 15619PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for the unpaid balance due on a sale and installation of a patented kitchen unit consisting of sink, dishwasher and cabinets, with incidentals consisting of changes in electrical outlets, laying of linoleum, painting, etc. In a trial to the court a balance of $1,536.72 was found due and judgment for plaintiff followed.

In their answer the defendants charged that some of the work was improperly and unskillfully performed. The trial court, on substantial evidence, found adversely to this defense and no point is made on that issue in the appeal.

The appellants’ appeal rests wholly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Costello v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MattoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Walker v. ThornsberryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Harbor Millwork, Inc. v. AchttienCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Currie v. StolowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Pace v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API