Lockwood v. City of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We must determine whether a claim alleging that the City of Pittsburgh was negligent in failing to install a guardrail along a curve in the road where an accident occurred falls within the streets exception to governmental immunity set forth in the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8542(b)(6). In Dean v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, 561 Pa. 503, 751 A.2d 1130 (2000) also decided today, we held that the failure to erect a guardrail is not a “dangerous condition of Commonwealth realty” for purposes of the real estate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Crowell v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- KILEY BY KILEY v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Kilgore v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Walker v. ElebySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Dooner v. DiDonatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Lindstrom v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.