Legal Opinion

Kilgore v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 1998No. 49 E.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether the City of Philadelphia is immune from liability under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act (“the Act”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 8541-8564.

Appellant, Walter Kilgore (“Kilgore”), an employee of Federal Express, was injured while working at Philadelphia International Airport. The accident occurred as Kilgore was standing by a motorized tug attached to a cargo dolly on an airport roadway. Specifically, Kilgore and a co-worker, Mark Newell, were attempting to hitch a cargo dolly to the motorized tug when Newell allegedly lost control of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Snyder v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Lockwood v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Williams v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Page v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API