Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. City of Corry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2000PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

The issues presented are whether a local agency owes a common law duty to a driver who flees from a police officer, and whether a claim on behalf of a fleeing driver falls within the vehicle liability exception to governmental immunity under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8541 et seq. (“Tort Claims Act”). We hold that a local agency has no common law duty to a fleeing driver, and accordingly, reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court. 1

On the evening of July 15, 1995, Appellees’ son, Ramsey, was driving his vehicle along South Center Street in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. HAWKS BY HAWKS v. LivermoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Schemberg v. SmicherkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Charlie, A. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Banking v. NCAS of Delaware, LLC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Walters v. UPMC Presbyterian ShadysideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Balentine v. Aplt. v. Chester Water AuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API