Lindstrom v. City of Corry
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAPPY, Justice.
The issues presented are whether a local agency owes a common law duty to a driver who flees from a police officer, and whether a claim on behalf of a fleeing driver falls within the vehicle liability exception to governmental immunity under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8541 et seq. (“Tort Claims Act”). We hold that a local agency has no common law duty to a fleeing driver, and accordingly, reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court. 1
On the evening of July 15, 1995, Appellees’ son, Ramsey, was driving his vehicle along South Center Street in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- HAWKS BY HAWKS v. LivermoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Schemberg v. SmicherkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Charlie, A. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Pennsylvania Department of Banking v. NCAS of Delaware, LLC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Walters v. UPMC Presbyterian ShadysideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Balentine v. Aplt. v. Chester Water AuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.