Legal Opinion
Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 21, 2010No. 2 WDA 2010, 109 WDA 2010, 112 WDA 2010, 113 WDA 2010PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DONOHUE, J.:
Duane Reott (“Mr. Reott”) and Patty Reott (“Mrs. Reott”) (collectively, “the Reotts”) appeal from the order entered on December 14, 2009, denying their motion for post-trial relief filed following a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, Asia Trend, Inc., Remington Arms Company and RA Brands, and The Sportsman’s Guide (collectively, “Appellees”). After careful review, we reverse and remand for a new trial limited to damages.
The parties do not dispute the basic facts in this case. In January of 2003, Mr. Reott’s brother, Douglas Reott (“Douglas”), ordered two identical…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Phillips v. Cricket LightersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Alvin DILLINGER, Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Wheeler MacHinery Company, Inc., a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Ferraro v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Parr, J. v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. TyackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- In Re: B. Fiedler, Appeal of: E. FiedlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- International Diamond Importers, Ltd. v. Singularity Clark, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.