Crowell v. City of Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDERMOTT, Justice.
Appellants come to us by allowance from an order of the Commonwealth Court which, inter alia, entered judgments non obstante veredicto, in favor of the City of Philadelphia and against appellants, 131 Pa.Cmwlth. 418, 570 A.2d 626. The basis of the Commonwealth Court ruling was that the City was immune from suit under provisions of the Governmental Immunity Act, 1 42 Pa.C.S. § 8541 et seq.
The germane facts of this case are uncontested. On May 17, 1981, Robert F. Crowell, his wife Linda Crowell, and their three year old son, Marc Ethan Crowell, were travelling in their…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Snyder v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Powell v. DrumhellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.