Legal Opinion
Hull v. Alaska Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1983No. 6346PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
Facts
The Hulls appeal from a summary judgment entered against them in superior court, allowing Alaska Federal Savings and Loan Association of Juneau [Alaska Federal] to retain the proceeds of two pledged savings accounts which served as security for a real estate transaction. At issue is whether this retention of security after a non-judicial foreclosure on the property was proper under the Alaska anti-deficiency statute (AS 34.20.100) and common law principles. We hold that the retention was proper and affirm the superior court.
In August 1975 Ronald and Jane Hull and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Union Bank v. GradskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Suber v. Alaska State Bond CommitteeAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Mariners Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Key Bank of Alaska v. DonnelsNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- First State Bank of Forsyth v. ChunkapuraMontana Supreme Court · 1987
- Hickel v. HalfordAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Fireman's Fund Mortgage Corp. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.