Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Forsyth v. Chunkapura

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1987No. 86-216PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

We hold in this case that a lender, electing to foreclose on its security under a trust deed by judicial procedure, is not entitled to remedies inconsistent with the Small Tract Financing Act of Montana, Title 71, Chapter 1, Part 3, MCA. Specifically, the lender (mortgagee) may not recover a deficiency judgment against the borrower (mortgagor), and the borrower has no right of redemption as is accorded borrowers in judicial foreclosures of conventional mortgages.

First State Bank of Forsyth and William F. Meisburger appealed from an order of the District Court, Sixteenth Judicial District,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Rainer Mortgage v. Silverwood, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fayette County National Bank v. LillyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Knucklehead Land Co. v. Accutitle, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Trustees of Washington — Idaho — Montana Carpenters — Employers Retirement Trust Fund v. Galleria PartnershipMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. City Consumer Services, Inc. v. PetersUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API