Legal Opinion
Circle Bolt & Nut Co. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 11, 2008No. 368 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
Circle Bolt & Nut Company, Inc. (Circle) petitions for review from a determination of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (Commission), which concluded that Circle unlawfully retaliated agdinst Tracy Dixon (Dixon) in violation of Section 5(d) of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (Act) and ordered Circle to pay Dixon lost wages. 1 We affirm.
Dixon began working for Circle, a wholesale distributor of nuts and bolts, in June of 2000. 2 While initially working at Circle, Dixon was employed as a boxer/sorter, although she performed a variety of tasks at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bailey v. StorlazziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Spanish Council of York, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Robert Wholey Co. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Raya & Haig Hair Salon v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Merrell v. Chartiers Valley School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- The School District of Philadelphia v. E. Jones E. Jones v. The School District of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Shanefelter v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- S. Vladimirsky v. The SD of Philadelphia The SD of Philadelphia v. S. VladimirskyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Donaldson v. Butler CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.