Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
This is an appeal by the Consolidated Rail Corp. (Conrail) from an order of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (Commission) which found that Conrail had discriminated against Robert P. Drumheiser (Complainant) on the basis of his age, in violation of Section 5(a) of the Pennsyl vania Human Relations Act (Act), Act of October 27, 1955, P.L. 744, as amended, 43 P.S. § 955(a). Mr. Drumheiser’s discrimination complaint is based on his assertion that because of his age, Conrail refused to grant him a leniency reinstatement following his discharge from service for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Alto-Reste Park Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Gen. Elec. Corp. v. COM. PA. HUM. R. COM.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Allegheny Housing Rehabilitation Corp. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Raya & Haig Hair Salon v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- McGlawn v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Circle Bolt & Nut Co. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Taylor v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- New Corey Creek Apartments, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.