Legal Opinion
Joyner v. Sibley Memorial Hospital
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 12, 2003No. 01-CV-124PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Senior Judge:
Jeanette Joyner contends that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment on some counts in her complaint and dismissing, without prejudice, the remaining counts in favor of appellees Sibley Memorial Hospital (“Sibley”) and Jill Stanton. 1 We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
When the incidents underlying the claims in this case arose, Joyner was a part-time clerk typist in the Medical Records Department (“MR”) and a part-time clerk typist in the Medical Staff Privileges Department (“MSP”) at Sibley. This appeal arises out of a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Arthur Young & Co. v. SutherlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kerrigan v. Britches of Georgetowne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Daka, Inc. v. BreinerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Christopher G. Pitt, Sr. And Tela Hansom-Pitt v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Griffin v. Acacia Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- McFarland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Powers-Bunce v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.