Legal Opinion
Daka, Inc. v. Breiner
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1998No. 95-CV-441PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Daka, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court in favor of James Breiner, a former Daka employee. Alleging age discrimination, Breiner filed suit against Daka under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, D.C.Code §§ 1-2501 et seq. (1993) (“DCHRA”). After a five-day trial, the jury found that Bremer had not established a prima facie case of wrongful termination, but it returned a verdict in his favor on his age-related hostile environment claim, awarding him $10,000 in compensatory damages and $390,000 in punitive damages. Daka then filed a motion for…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Elzeneiny v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Mazloum v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.