Legal Opinion
Kerrigan v. Britches of Georgetowne, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 23, 1997No. 94-CV-918PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Appellant Kerrigan, a former employee of Britches of Georgetowne, Inc. (Britches), brought suit against his former employer asserting causes of action for (1) discrimination, (2) defamation, (3) breach of the covenant of good faith and confidentiality, (4) intentional infliction of emotional distress, and (5) negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment for Britches. Kerrigan contends on appeal that the trial court erred in granting judgment on the last three of these claims. We affirm.
I
In 1992, Britches employed Kerrigan as a district manager. In August 1992,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hanoch Tel-Oren, in His Capacity as Father, on Behalf of the Deceased, Imry Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab Republic Hanoch Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab RepublicCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Adams v. George W. Cochran & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Waldon v. CovingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Christopher G. Pitt, Sr. And Tela Hansom-Pitt v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Larijani v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Kassem v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.