Legal Opinion
United States v. Carr
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 9, 2007No. 06-0758/AFPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review of the sole issue Appellant assigned as error, to determine whether Appellant’s guilty pleas to assault consummated by a battery were improvident because evidence indicated he obtained consent from the alleged victims by fraud in the inducement rather than fraud in the factum. We hold that Appellant’s pleas were provident and affirm.
I
At a general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone, Appellant pled guilty to being absent without leave terminated by apprehension and being derelict in the performance of his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. NapoleonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. OuthierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. CraigNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- United States v. Sergeant RYAN M. GORSKIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012
- United States v. HolmesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. HallUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. TimsurenUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.