Van De Water v. Pridham
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District to review proceedings creating and establishing a drainage district. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J.—Certiorari.
The board of supervisors of Los Angeles County, claiming authority so to do under and by virtue of the provisions of a certain act of the legislature entitled, “An act to promote the drainage of wet, swamp and overflowed lands, and to promote the public health in the communities in which they lie,” approved March 21, 1903 (Stats. 1903, p. 354), the title to which and the act were amended in 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 359), in a proceeding instituted therefor by petition, created and established a drainage district designated as “Los Angeles County Drainage District No. 1,” the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hagar v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Torrance v. McDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gadd v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. All Persons & PartiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. All Persons & PartiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957