Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District
California Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1938No. S. F. 15990PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This proceeding in mandamus presents the question of the constitutionality of section 13% of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Act added to the statute in 1937 (Stats. 1937, p. 1763). The original statute is found in the statutes of 1915 at page 1502.
The petitioners allege their ownership of lands situated and assessable within the Los Angeles County Flood Control District but outside the confines of certain named drainage districts within the flood control district. The petition shows that in December, 1937, the board of supervisors of Los Angeles County, acting as the board of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Ambrosini v. Alisal Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- County of Los Angeles v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Monterey County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.