Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 24, 1994No. OBAD No. 911. SCBD No. 3582PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Is the record 1 sufficient for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint’s disposition? and (2) Is a two-year-and-one-day suspension with imposition of costs, to be effective from November 30, 1989 (the date on which respondent took associate-member status), an appropriate disciplinary sanction to be imposed for respondent’s breach of professional discipline? We answer both questions in the affirmative.

The Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] charged Jean M. Caldwell [respondent] with two…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. HoldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MinterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API