State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Caldwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Is the record 1 sufficient for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint’s disposition? and (2) Is a two-year-and-one-day suspension with imposition of costs, to be effective from November 30, 1989 (the date on which respondent took associate-member status), an appropriate disciplinary sanction to be imposed for respondent’s breach of professional discipline? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
The Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] charged Jean M. Caldwell [respondent] with two…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. HoldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MinterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.