Legal Opinion
Schwarzkopf Technologies Corp. v. Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 3, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-464-JJFPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Defendant Ingersoll Cutting Tool Company’s Motion to Transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In addition, Plaintiff Schwarzkopf Technologies Corporation (Schwarzkopf) has filed a Motion to Strike Defendant’s Inequitable Conduct Defenses and Defendant Ingersoll Cutting Tool Company (Ingersoll) has filed a Motion to File Supplemental Affirmative Defenses. All motions have been fully briefed. For the reasons stated below, the Court will deny Defendant’s Motion to Transfer,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Lunsford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Plum Tree, Inc. v. StockmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Mayer v. Development Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Aruba Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Seidel v. LeeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Critikon, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- EMC Corp. v. Storage Technology Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- In Re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.