Legal Opinion
EMC Corp. v. Storage Technology Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 20, 1996No. Civil Action 94-482-JJFPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court is the Motion for a More Definite Statement (D.I. 96.) filed by Defendant Storage Technology Corporation (“STK”). STK claims that Plaintiff EMC Corporation (“EMC”) has failed to plead facts with particularity in Paragraph Seven of its Counterclaim and Answer to Defendant STK’s Third Counterclaim as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b). Specifically, STK contends that EMC alleges inequitable conduct by STK during the prosecution of United States Patent Number 5,459,857 (“the ’857 patent”) but does not provide any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. SimonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Schwarzkopf Technologies Corp. v. Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Continental Illinois Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Scervini v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
3Cited by15 opinions
- Venetec International, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Icu Medical, Inc. v. Rymed Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Abbott Laboratories v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- Cordance Corp. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Environ Products, Inc. v. Total Containment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.