Legal Opinion

In Re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 31, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-60-JJFPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff William Seidel commenced this action on February 3, 1992 by filing.a class action against numerous defendants alleging various violations of the federal securities laws. Ronald Goldstein filed a substantially identical complaint on February 5, 1992. On May 14, following an order of the Court to consolidate, the Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint. In the Consolidated Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants organized and sold interests in ML-LEE Acquisition Fund II, L.P. (“Fund II”) and ML-Lee Acquisition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Kirschner Bros. Oil, Inc. v. PannillDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  3. Ungrund v. Cunningham Brothers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1969
  4. Sports Eye, Inc. v. Daily Racing Form, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
  5. Schwarzkopf Technologies Corp. v. Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Joint Stock Society "Trade House of Descendants of Peter Smirnoff, Official Purveyor to the Imperial Court" v. Heublein, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
  2. MEC Resources, LLC v. Apple, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
  3. Critikon, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  5. Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API