Legal Opinion

Menge v. Manthey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 3, 1929:

Fritz, J.

The crucial facts are not in dispute. Defendant Manthey’s automobile was wrecked on a dark night in about the middle of a public, country highway, by colliding with an automobile driven by one Stickler. Manthey’s car was disabled so that it could not be moved on its wheels, and its headlights could not function. At the place of collision the traveled portion of the highway was about seventeen feet wide, and there was enough room on both sides of Manthey’s automobile for others to pass. Manthey immediately rode in a passing automobile…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Village of Weyauwega v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Madix v. Hochgreve Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Kastler v. TuresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Ouellette v. Superior Motor & Machine WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Calumet Auto Co. v. DinyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Geisen v. LuceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. LaFleur v. PoeschNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Criswell v. Seaman Body Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Kohler v. SheffertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  5. Frame v. Arrow Towing ServiceOregon Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API