Legal Opinion

Frame v. Arrow Towing Service

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by negligence of the defendants. The defendants Alfred Pietila and John H. Pietila made no appearance and a judgment by default was entered against them. A verdict for $1,776.81 was returned against the defendant Arrow Towing Service, a corporation, and one in favor of the defendant Mary Elizabeth Menefee. Defendant Arrow Towing Service appeals.

The motions of the defendant appellant for a directed verdict and an involuntary non-suit require, in accordance with well-established legal principles, a brief…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dare v. BossOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Kastler v. TuresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Myrtle Point Transp. Co. v. Port of Coquille RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Murray v. HelfrichOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Stamos v. Portland Electric Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shelton v. LOWELLOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Cameron v. GoreeOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gossett v. Van EgmondOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Savage Adm'x v. PalmerOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McMullen v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API