Legal Opinion

Kirksey v. Assurance Tire Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 1, 1993No. 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

Assurance Tire Company and the South Carolina Insolvency Fund appeal the decision of the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission awarding Moses Kirksey benefits for an on-the-job accident. The circuit court affirmed. Assurance Tire Company and the Insolvency Fund argue Assurance Tire Company did not regularly employ four employees at the time of Kirksey’s accident and, therefore, the commission did not have subject matter jurisdiction to award Kirksey benefits. We reverse.

Because the issue here is jurisdictional, the commission’s findings of fact relative to the number…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Li'l General StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Hollowell v. North Carolina Department of Conservation & DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Behrensen v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  4. Charlottesville Music Center, Inc. v. McCraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  5. Lambard v. Saga Food Service, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kirksey v. Assurance Tire Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. SER Discover Financial Services, Inc. v. Hon. David W. Nibert and SER Glaxosmithkline, LLC v. Hon. James H. Young, Jr.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Voss v. Ramco, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Harding v. PlumleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Shuler v. Tri-County Electric Co-Op, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API