Legal Opinion

Hollowell v. North Carolina Department of Conservation & Development

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1934PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It is manifest the assault, which resulted in Hollowell’s death, was occasioned by the testimony given by him as a witness for the State on the trial of the two Nixons. The question then occurs: Is a witness, who appears at a judicial hearing and gives evidence under the court’s precept, an employee of the party litigant in whose behalf he testifies? The answer is, No.

The liability of one to pay, and the right of another to receive, compensation, under the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act, depends, in the first instance, upon some appointment or the existence of the relation of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Harden v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Hunt v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Vaivida v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. County of Monterey v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Lucas v. Li'l General StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Lemmerman v. A. T. Williams Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Paquette v. County of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Hicks v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API