Harding v. Plumley
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUFF, Judge:
This is a worker’s compensation case. Employee Stephen Harding appeals an order of the circuit court which affirmed the conclusion of the Workers’ Compensation Commission that his employer, Craig Plumley d/b/a Plumley Construction Com pany, was not subject to the terms of the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act. We affirm.
INTRODUCTION
On September 2, 1991, Stephen Harding received an accidental injury to his right eye while employed as a laborer with Craig Plumley, d/b/a Plumley Construction Company. Harding filed a worker’s compensation claim. The claim was denied by Plumley…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Durham v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Ost v. Integrated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Kirksey v. Assurance Tire Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Smith v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Osborne v. FornerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Hernandez-Zuniga v. TickleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Hartzell v. Palmetto Collision, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- Osteen v. Greenville County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Osteen v. Greenville County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998