Legal Opinion
Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. R. H. Macy & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 13, 1940No. 244PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is by defendant, R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., from a decree holding certain patent claims valid and infringed. Sales of the alleged infringing devices by the defendant in the Southern District of New York was proved and is not disputed.
The plaintiff, Schick Dry Shaver, Inc., is a Delaware corporation which is the exclusive licensee of the two patents in suit. The patents are owned by the other plaintiff, Schick Industries, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Bahama Islands, B. W. I. They are No. 1,721,530 which was granted to Jacob Schick for a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Steward v. American Lava Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- De La Vergne Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. FeatherstoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. Dictograph Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Safety Table Co. v. SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- American Safety Table Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. Joseph Schreiber and David Goldberg, Individually and as Partners Trading as Schreiber & Goldberg, Defendants-Appellees-Appellants. American Safety Table Company, Inc. v. Joseph Schreiber and David Goldberg, Individually and as Partners Trading as Schreiber & GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Bussemer v. Artwire Creations, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Armstrong v. Emerson Radio and Phonograph Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- American Technical Machinery Corp. v. CaparottaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.