Legal Opinion
Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. Dictograph Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 12, 1937No. 257PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs are the exclusive licensee and the owner of the patents in suit who stand as one in respect to the issues and will be so treated herein.
The patents sued on are Nos. 1,721,530 and 1,757,978 issued on July 23, 1929, and May 13, 1930, respectively, on applications filed by Jacob Schick on March 21, 1928, and April 23, 1928. The first mentioned is for a shaving implement and the second, which is an improvement patent, is for a shaving machine. Claims 1 and 13 of No. 1,721,530 and claim 5 of No. 1,757,-978 are relied on. As there is no dispute which turns on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Keystone Driller Co. v. Northwest Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dominion Magnesium Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Motoshaver, Inc. v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Nicholl, Inc. v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. Motoshaver, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1937
- Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. R. H. Macy & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.