Legal Opinion
Duane v. Government Employees Insurance
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 7, 1992No. Civ. HM-91-2654PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HERBERT F. MURRAY, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff, Vincent P. Duane, brought this action for discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against the defendants, Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company (collectively “GEICO”). Presently before the Court is the motion of the defendants to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1
I. FACTUAL SUMMARY
This Court recognizes the long-accepted rule that
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not require a claimant to set out in detail the facts upon which he bases…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Farasat v. PaulikasDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Garamendi v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Duane v. GEICOCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Costle v. Fremont Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.