Legal Opinion
Duane v. GEICO
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 12, 1994No. 92-1616PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DONALD RUSSELL wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge ERVIN and Judge WILKINS joined.
OPINION
DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to dismiss plaintiff Vincent Duane’s discrimination claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 784 F.Supp. 1209. We find no error in the district court’s denial and affirm.
I
Vincent Duane is a lawfully admitted, permanent resident alien of the United States and a citizen of Australia. On June 3, 1991, Duane contacted GEICO about obtaining…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sagana v. TenorioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Chacko v. Texas a & M UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
- Gray v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Cheung v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Abuzant v. Shelter Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.