Legal Opinion

In Re Mutual Funds Investment Litigation

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 25, 2005No. MDL-1586. No. Civ. 04-MD-15863PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUND DERIVATIVE OPINION

MOTZ, District Judge.

This opinion addresses the motions to dismiss filed in a derivative action instituted on behalf of Janus Investment Fund (“JIF”), Janus Aspen Series (“JAS”), and Janus Advisor Series (“JAD”) 1 against various Janus entities, officers, and fund trustees and numerous third-party broker/dealers and traders. The nature and structure of these MDL proceedings are described in the companion opinion I am issuing today on motions to dismiss filed in the investor class action in the “Janus subtrack.”

The derivative plaintiffs have asserted various state law…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnston v. BoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Christopher Brown v. John CalamosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. In Re Mutual Funds Investment LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  4. Unión De Empleados De Muelles De Puerto Rico PRSSA Welfare Plan v. UBS Financial Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. In Re Regions Morgan Keegan Securities, DerivativeDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API