In Re Mutual Funds Investment Litigation
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
FUND DERIVATIVE OPINION
MOTZ, District Judge.
This opinion addresses the motions to dismiss filed in a derivative action instituted on behalf of Janus Investment Fund (“JIF”), Janus Aspen Series (“JAS”), and Janus Advisor Series (“JAD”) 1 against various Janus entities, officers, and fund trustees and numerous third-party broker/dealers and traders. The nature and structure of these MDL proceedings are described in the companion opinion I am issuing today on motions to dismiss filed in the investor class action in the “Janus subtrack.”
The derivative plaintiffs have asserted various state law…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnston v. BoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Christopher Brown v. John CalamosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- In Re Mutual Funds Investment LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Unión De Empleados De Muelles De Puerto Rico PRSSA Welfare Plan v. UBS Financial Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- In Re Regions Morgan Keegan Securities, DerivativeDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.