Legal Opinion
In Re Mutual Funds Investment Litigation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 19, 2007No. MDL 04-MD-15863, 04-MD-15864PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
This multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) proceeding involves allegations of market timing and late trading in the mutual fund industry. The proceeding is divided into three tracks, and each track is presided over by one of three judges in this district — Judge Blake, Judge Davis, and me. Because a series of prior opinions recited the basic underpinnings of this MDL, familiarity with the facts is presumed. 1
Since the time these earlier opinions were issued, discovery has been proceeding. Simultaneously, some of the defendants have been involved in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gratz v. BollingerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mahon v. Ticor Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Danielle Santomenno v. John Hancock Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Seidl v. American Century Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re RadioShack Corp. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2008
- Haddock v. Nationwide Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.