Legal Opinion

Christopher Brown v. John Calamos

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 10, 2011No. 11-1785PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA) prohibits securities class actions if the class has more than 50 members, the suit is not exclusively derivative, relief is sought on the basis of state law, and the class action suit is brought by “any private party alleging a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security.” 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(f)(l), amending Securities Exchange Act of 1934; see also § 77p(b)(l), amending, in materially identical language, the Securities Act of 1933. A “covered…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  4. Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Appert v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Timothy DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. William Hampton v. Pacific Investment ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  5. Patricia Holtz v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API