Johnston v. Box
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.
In this appeal, we consider whether a complaint in a shareholder derivative action is sufficient under Delaware law to survive a motion to dismiss. Specifically, we must determine whether its particularized factual allegations create a reasonable doubt that the board of directors (board) of American Tower Corporation (ATC) was capable of exercising independent and disinterested judgment in responding to allegations that former and current officers and directors had colluded in the improper backdating of stock options. If the factual allegations are sufficient, the plaintiff stockholder, Eric…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Halebian v. BervCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Merrimack College v. KPMG LLPMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Diamond v. PappathanasiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Askenazy v. KPMG LLPMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.