Hess v. Fox Rothschild, LLP
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
McCAFFERY, J.:
¶ 1 Appellants, Frederick Lee Hess, Jr. and Richard R. Hess, appeal from the order of the trial court that dismissed with prejudice their amended complaint sounding in legal malpractice against Appellees, Fox Rothschild, LLP, and Barbara Flack-er, Esq., Appellants’ stepmother’s attorneys. Appellants ask us to determine whether the trial court erred in granting Appellees’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, which contended that Appellants did not have standing and did not raise any cognizable claim. Following careful review, we affirm.
¶ 2 Briefly, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bilt-Rite Contractors, Inc. v. Architectural StudioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Lineberger v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Cardenas v. SchoberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Greater Erie Industrial Development Corp. v. Presque Isle Downs, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Feingold v. HendrzakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Weiley v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Cooper v. Frankford Health Care System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Estate of BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.