Legal Opinion

Feingold v. Hendrzak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2011PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, P.J.:

Appellant, Allen Feingold, files this pro ne appeal from the May 13, 2010 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, sustaining Appellees’ preliminary objections and dismissing Appellant’s complaint with prejudice. After careful review, we affirm and find Appellant’s complaint to be utterly frivolous. Due to Appellant’s repetitive filing of baseless appeals in this Court, we sua, sponte award all Appellees in the instant case attorney’s fees and remand to the trial court for calculation of these fees.

Appellant, a former Pennsylvania attorney,1 previously…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. McKeeman v. Corestates Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Lerner v. LernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Hess v. Fox Rothschild, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Forest Highlands Community Ass'n v. HammerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Greater Erie Industrial Development Corp. v. Presque Isle Downs, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Forest Resources, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Richmond v. McHaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Grimm, R. v. Grimm, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Schemberg v. SmicherkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API