Legal Opinion

Cady v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of Burlington

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 11, 2018No. SC 20011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.

**504*317The defendant GM Retirement, LLC,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the administrative appeal of the plaintiff, Bruce A. Cady.2 In the present appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court improperly (1) concluded that the defendant's proposed revision of boundary lines between certain adjacent lots constituted a new subdivision under General Statutes § 8-18,3 thereby implicating § IV.B.5 of the Burlington Zoning Regulations (regulations), which requires an increased minimum lot area for new subdivisions, and (2) applied § III.F.7 of the regulations, which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCrann v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  2. Kuchta v. ArisianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. Goodridge v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Tuxis Ohr's Fuel, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Newman v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Dept. of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. Costas v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  3. Jeweler v. WiltonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  4. Tillman v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API