Newman v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that the named defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Avon (commission), improperly had interpreted and applied a density provision of Avon’s zoning regulations applicable to residential lots when it granted the subdivision application of the defendants Mary Markow and Eric R. Secor, Jr. (applicants). The defendants appeal 2 from the judgment of the trial court, which sustained the plaintiffs’ 3 appeal from the decision of the commission. We reverse the judgment of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Graff v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Alvord Investment, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Jalowiec Realty Associates, L.P. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Cohen v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mountain Brook Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Cady v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Egan v. Planning Board of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012