Legal Opinion

Kuchta v. Arisian

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 24, 2018No. SC 19730PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDONALD, J.

**531*410"The outdoor sign or symbol is a venerable medium for expressing political, social and commercial ideas." (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

**532Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego , 453 U.S. 490, 501, 101 S.Ct. 2882, 69 L.Ed. 2d 800 (1981). The primary issue we must resolve in this case is whether General Statutes § 8-2,1 which authorizes a municipality's zoning commission to regulate the height, size, and location of "advertising signs and billboards," permits a municipality to regulate signs erected on residential property that disparage a commercial vendor.

The plaintiff, the zoning…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Douglas C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. Raspberry Junction Holding, LLC v. Southeastern Connecticut Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  3. Cady v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  4. State v. BemerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  5. State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API