Legal Opinion

Harkness v. Hall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1997No. 59A04-9609-CV-377PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Robert and Tamara Harkness appeal from the grant of Orange County Commissioners’ motion for summary judgment on their claims against the county. We reverse.

FACTS

On May 18, 1994, Tamara Harkness was driving her automobile on a certain county road in Orange County. Her husband Robert was a passenger. About .8 mile from the town of Valeene, the roadway descends a hill and curves toward a one lane bridge. After crossing the bridge, the roadway curves again and ascends another hill. “One Lane Bridge” signs are posted as the roadway approaches the bridge…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mullin v. Municipal City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Rome v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Tibbs v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Henshilwood v. Hendricks CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Geico Insurance v. RowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Kantz v. Elkhart County Highway DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Matter of Estate of MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Garza v. LorchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Serviss v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API