Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Meyer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1998No. 45A03-9802-CV-43PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellants-Respondents Scot L. Burke and Kathy A. Burke appeal the trial court’s ruling on cross-motions for partial summary judgment that the death tax liability should be shared proportionally between two trusts created by the decedent Harold Meyer. Ap-pellees-Petitioners Janet Cleland, Beth Gar-rigus, Tim Cleland, Gary Cleland, Dianne Carlsson, Tamara Cleland (the Clelands) and Bank One cross-appeal.

FACTS 1

This case arises from conflicting tax payment provisions in a will and a subsequent inter vivos trust. On April 1, 1985, Meyer executed his will which provided that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. In re the Estate of PickrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Estate of Monroe v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. Estate of Monroe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  5. Harkness v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of Denman, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  2. National General Insurance v. RiddellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Rowe v. Indiana Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Whittington v. MagnanteIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Estate Sheppard Ex Rel. McMorrow v. SchleisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API